I'm just confused as to why ign.com can only give good game reviews to Call of Duty, Battlefield, Skyrim, or Batman? Seriously, these are all good games yes, but why is it when a game that isnt hyped to the floor boards comes across the review desk it gets shit from them.
Just finished the Darkness II. The game was great. I loved the first one so much. I played that game all the way through 3 times and I could still do it today. Its a little off the norm compared to some games and thats what sets it apart from all the other games on the market. And The Darkness II did the same thing with some added effects to make the game look like the comic book which is where the game is inspired from. Although I wasn't a fan of the comic book look, the game was still great. I really enjoyed it and I'm going to start working on the Vendettas in the game next.
ign.com loves to get meticulously crucial with these kind of games and it pisses me off. Does the story deliver and keep you interested? Yes. Was there lots of shooting and gore that got you excited every time you ripped a person in half with the darkness? Fuck yes!!! So y u ruin the game ign.com with your dumb review. If the game is good and makes you want to play the story more than once it should at least get a 9. Unlike Call of Duty where I could give a shit about the story after its been played, but alas, they keep giving these games 9 to 9.5's.
So today The Darkness II, I salute you for being a good game, although short, you kept me occupied and happy for 7 hours. Now on to the vendettas which will give me more enjoyment.
~Thanks for Stopping by~
Luke
No comments:
Post a Comment